● | Live Nation is responsible for the adequacy and accuracy of the disclosure in the 2014 Form 10-K; |
● | Staff comments or changes to disclosure in response to Staff comments do not foreclose the Commission from taking any action with respect to the 2014 Form 10-K; and |
● | Live Nation may not assert Staff comments as a defense in any proceeding initiated by the Commission or any person under the federal securities laws of the United States. |
• | Providing the number of events by venue type would not provide information to the reader that is more useful to them then the narrative provided in MD&A already. As the Company does not present revenue based on venue type in accordance with Regulation S-X, the reader would not be able to determine if the changes in the number of individual venue type events is affecting similar changes in its revenue stream, and indeed may misinterpret such information by assuming precisely that correlation. The Company therefore continues to believe that it is more helpful to provide narrative on what the additional drivers are outside of the change in total fans and total events. |
• | Changes in Concerts segment revenue do not necessarily follow any trend in venue-type event increases and decreases, therefore making it less corroborative, and less predictive, for the reader. This is, in part, because of the impacts to revenue from factors such as attendance, ticket prices and ancillary revenue streams (e.g., concessions and merchandise). In addition, revenue by venue type and revenue by specific show by venue type can vary greatly so that the increase or decrease in events by venue type do not necessarily drive consistent changes in revenue. Again, providing events by venue type could therefore present a distorted picture for the reader. |
• | With this many categories of venue types, the Company believes the level of data provided would make it difficult for a reader to discern what is important to consider most relevant. |
• | The revenue generated from secondary ticket sales is less than 3% of total revenue and is, therefore, not a material source of the Company’s revenue. While not inconsequential to the Ticketing segment, it is currently still not a significant portion of the segment revenue. |
• | The number of secondary tickets sold is less than 4% of total fee-bearing tickets sold. |
• | Provide us your pre-tax income/loss, statutory tax rate, and tax expense/benefit by jurisdiction; |
• | For each jurisdiction where the tax expense/benefit differs from the pre-tax income/loss multiplied by the statutory rate, please explain to us the nature of the differences; |
• | Please explain to us how the $10,735 reconciling item titled “differences between foreign and United States statutory rates” was calculated or determined; and |
• | Explain to us why your provision for income taxes includes foreign tax expense (rather than a tax benefit) considering you had a net foreign loss before taxes of $83.6 million. |
Country | Pre-tax Income/(Loss) | Statutory Tax Rate | Hypothetical Income Tax Expense/(Benefit) at Statutory Rate | Tax Expense/(Benefit) After Adjustment | Variance | Reasons (see below) |
United States | [***] | 35% | [***] | [***] | [***] | 2,3,4,5,6 |
United Kingdom | [***] | 21% | [***] | [***] | [***] | 1,3,4,5 |
Luxembourg | [***] | 29% | [***] | [***] | [***] | 1 |
Netherlands | [***] | 25% | [***] | [***] | [***] | 2,3,4 |
France | [***] | 34% | [***] | [***] | [***] | 3,4,5 |
Canada | [***] | 26% | [***] | [***] | [***] | 2,3,4,5 |
Spain | [***] | 30% | [***] | [***] | [***] | 3,4,5 |
Germany | [***] | 33% | [***] | [***] | [***] | 4,5 |
Norway | [***] | 27% | [***] | [***] | [***] | 3,4,5 |
Finland | [***] | 20% | [***] | [***] | [***] | 3,4,5 |
Poland | [***] | 19% | [***] | [***] | [***] | 3,4,5 |
Hong Kong | [***] | 17% | [***] | [***] | [***] | |
Belgium | [***] | 34% | [***] | [***] | [***] | |
Ireland | [***] | 13% | [***] | [***] | [***] | |
Denmark | [***] | 25% | [***] | [***] | [***] | |
Turkey | [***] | 20% | [***] | [***] | [***] | |
New Zealand | [***] | 28% | [***] | [***] | [***] | |
Australia | [***] | 30% | [***] | [***] | [***] | |
Italy | [***] | 31% | [***] | [***] | [***] | |
Total | [***] | [***] | [***] | [***] | ||
The table above includes the detail by jurisdiction for all countries with more than $1 million in pre-tax income/expense; all others net to zero |
1. | The Company had two items that were treated as tax rate adjustments in 2014 with a total benefit of approximately $25 million. These items were: |
a. | In Luxembourg, the actual statutory rate that we are subject to is different than the published statutory rate due to tax rulings received; |
b. | The Company impaired goodwill in 2014 within the International Concerts reporting unit for US GAAP purposes. This amount is not deductible for tax purposes. |
2. | There are amounts attributable to the exclusion or inclusion of certain financial statement items that are not taxable or deductible for tax and also amounts that must be included in income or |
3. | The statutory tax expense is adjusted in some jurisdictions for expenses that decrease financial statement income but are not deductible for tax purposes. Examples of these items include interest expense where the debt to equity ratio is in excess of the amount allowed by the tax rules, fines and penalties, impairments to intangibles and disallowed meals and entertainment expenses. These amounts totaled approximately $55 million in 2014. |
4. | There are various other items that have a different treatment for book and tax purposes that include reserves for uncertain tax return positions pursuant to ASC 740-10-25, return-to-provision adjustments for prior period tax returns finalization and the effect of statutory rate changes on deferred taxes. These items were a net benefit of approximately $11 million in 2014. |
5. | There are jurisdictions in which the Company does not recognize a tax benefit for net operating losses (“NOLs”) as they are incurred as it is required to set up an offsetting valuation allowance for these NOLs. Valuation allowances are recorded in these jurisdictions because the Company has concluded, based on historical experience, that there is not sufficient income in these jurisdictions to support the NOLs future realization, as required pursuant to ASC 740-10-30-17. The valuation allowances are subsequently increased in those jurisdictions for additional losses incurred or reduced for the utilization of the NOLs against current period taxable income. The change in valuation allowances was a benefit of approximately $6 million in 2014. |
6. | The United States is one of the jurisdictions where the Company has established a valuation allowance for federal tax purposes. However, the Company incurs state tax expense because of separate filings in certain states. The amount of state tax expense was approximately $10 million in 2014. |
Total pre-tax loss | $ | (100 | ) |
US loss | 16 | ||
Foreign loss | (84 | ) | |
US statutory tax rate | 35 | % | |
Foreign tax at US statutory rate | (29 | ) | |
Foreign tax at foreign statutory rate | (15 | ) | |
Difference | 14 | ||
Adjustment for goodwill impairment and Luxembourg ruling benefit | (25 | ) | |
Difference between foreign and US statutory rates | $ | (11 | ) |
• | This overall foreign loss is primarily attributable to the goodwill impairment of $117 million recorded in 2014 related to the International Concerts reporting unit for which no benefit on taxes will be realized. |
• | The other main driver affecting the nonrecognition of tax benefits is losses in jurisdictions where the Company has determined that sufficient income of the appropriate character does not exist within the carryback or carryforward period under the tax law to absorb the NOLs so that the tax benefits can be realized. The Company has recorded valuation allowances for these NOLs. |